- Click HERE to see the press release from the Integrity Commission.
- Click the icon below to listen to MP Warmington's response:
After reading the Integrity Commission's press release, I said MP Warmington got a knockout punch for the first time. Probably, I was a bit biased against MP Warmington. After listening to the MP, I have concluded that while we definitely need an Integrity Commission, we certainly need a Warmington in the House of Parliament.
Mark my word, Warmington no fool! The Chairman of the Integrity Commission must respond to MP Warmington. The question of the Auditor General being a member of an Integrity Commission which she should also audit, is a serious matter.
I look forward to your comments. This is an important national discussion which we need to have.
SEND INFORMATION
Send your news and other information by WhatsApp to 876 816-5261. Sources will never be revealed. I am Vernon Derby and you can take my word for that.
___________________________
Click NOW! |
Click here NOW! |
___________________________
5 comments:
How can they audit themself? Integrity? My word!
Leave the IC alone. Can't rate you Vernon.
Maybe we shoukd rewrite all laws. Warrington has never been a fool. He has been ill-tempered, obstreperous and outrageous. Fool is not a word thar shuld be used in sentence with Warmy. His behaviour is not fitting period. The Audit could easily be carried out by a private firm at a cost to the taxpayer even if the Auditor General is a Commissioner. The Auditor General is not conducting spending. So again a smoke screen. God help Jamaica. Here is my question.. There is a parliamentary committee overseeing the work of the IC. Has WARMY raised the iissue there?
Furthermore, performance audits can be requested by the PAC or PAAC. Why is he complaining about the AG being a commissioner when they can change the law as the legislature allows?
Warmington is creating a deflection on behalf of his party. Let the commission do their work. The issue that he’s raising may be valid, but it’s to be dealt with in a different setting at a different time. It’s like trying two different cases at the same time in the same court. He’s trying to discredit the commission on a technicality because his boss is in trouble. A boss that already fired him
I admire Mr Warmington's bold stance! We need many more like him. I was not very impressed with Mr Seymour Panton's contribution- he seems very insincere - I expected better from him- poor fellow
Post a Comment