The real problem is that the implementation of this recently amended law, has come about without a well organized, national discussion and educational programmes about this it. This has put us in an embarrassing situation of having to contemplate changing a law, days after the law has been put into effect.
I should add that there is need to move the traffic ticketing system out of the judicial system. The only time we should go to court for traffic ticket, is if we are disputing a ticket given by an officer. We saw the massive crowds at the traffic courts this week. The court should not be a place to ensure that ticket fines are paid. If you do not pay the fines, then your vehicle should be liable to be seized. You should also not be able to do any transactions involving your vehicle if these fines are not paid. If these fines remain unpaid for an extended period of time, then your license should be cancelled.
This idea of the police using their discretion until the law is amended gives me the impression that the political directorate is influencing the functioning of the JCF. The job of the police is to uphold the low and not to use their discretion in terms of which law to uphold and which not to. It is the same discretion that is used when one has the option to lef or to write!
Simple as that!
As soon as I get on the computer I will change the parts of the article, which says the law is new.. I will state the amended law. This will not change my position on the need for educating the public about the changes and also that aspects of the law not previously enforced which will will now be enforced.
ReplyDelete