Let me make this clear, there are many citizens who have suggested ideas over the years as to how to deal with this crime problem, but many of these ideas and suggestions have been ignored. Now our political parties are into an argument over paternity of these so-called new ideas rather than who will unite to deal with crime decisively. I remember quite well when possible, over twenty years ago, when I headed the first national citizens lobby group called Citizens' Initiative Organization, we presented ideas to the government to deal with crime. These ideas came from citizens associations from across the island. Most ideas were ignored. The only ones I recall being implemented is the night sitting of courts and the victim support scheme.
One of those ideas was to have a National Identification System (NIDS) which I discussed with Mr. Noel Lee who was then the head of the Electoral Commission. Government, is about to implement the National Identification System, but it will not be compulsory, and persons can withdraw from the system at any time. If it will not be compulsory then why have it? Many of you who follow me on radio should be aware that I have been promoting this National Identification System for a very very long time.
In recent times, I have concluded that it is a few persons who are contributing to the general mayhem in the society, especially as it relates to murder. I have suggested on air more than once that we need to take steps to eliminate these persons from the system who are creating the problems. I have called these persons local terrorists and we are at war with them. We should treat them as enemies of the state.
My basic suggestions to deal with the challenge are as follows:
- Have a National Identification System (NIDS) which means that every Jamaican citizen would be uniquely identified and registered in a secure computerized system.
- Based on this NIDS, we would be able to track charges against the criminals in the computerized system. The system should be based on the philosophy that for each subsequent offence committed, the punishment and/or the fine will be increased.
- For the first offence one could get a non-custodial sentence, but for the second time you are convicted of an offence, then incarceration could be increased to 5 years. A third time you would end up getting a life sentence. This would be one way to remove problem persons from the society.
- If one is caught with an illegal gun or any such weapon of that nature which can harm or kill someone, then on the first conviction, the convicted person should get 15 years. For a second offence the convicted person would get a life sentence. I should point out that if you have two cases and you are convicted for both, then you would get a life sentence.
- Anyone convicted for trading illegal weapons and drugs should get life sentence.
- Persons who the security forces have intelligence for, and the intelligence tells them that these persons pose a serious threat to the society; it can be confirmed that they are a part of a criminal network, they should be treated as local terrorists. Based on intelligence and by an order of the court these persons should be put on a watch list for a period of at least one year. These persons would be required to report to a station periodically and their activities closely monitored by the security forces. If they fail to report to the police, then the court would determine that these persons are fugitives and an order would be given for them to be carried in dead or alive by members of the security forces or by citizens. This law would only last for five years in which time all gangs should have been obliterated from the country.
- If the proper running of the state is threatened by any person or group of persons in the country, then with a two thirds majority support of parliament, emergency measures should be put in place to suspend the rights of these persons for at least one year until their organization has been totally obliterated. Application would first have to be made to the courts for these persons rights to be suspended based on intelligence that their operations have jeopardized the rights of other citizens.
- Any person or persons who abuses this law in pursuant of any political agenda, or to maliciously destroy the reputation of any person, or for any corrupt means, then on conviction they should serve a life sentence.
- The government needs to remove minor offences from the judicial system and deal with these offences with a Ticketable Offense System (TOS), Under this system, if one commits a traffic offence or litter the streets, then that person could be issued with a ticket, and they would have to pay for that ticket. If one obtains tickets above a certain quantity this should result in serious penalties. The responsible officers should be able to issue warning tickets and for each subsequent ticket received, the cost should increase significantly. The idea of this system is not to make money for the state, but to dissuade persons from breaking the law. One would only go to court to dispute a ticket.
No one seams to know the solution for crime it getting out of control
ReplyDeleteYou need to sit down with the stubborn PM. If the govt. cannot monitor the traffic ticketing system tell me how they will monitor and enforce suggestions put forward..
ReplyDeleteGood suggestions but a few critical aspects are missing; corporal punishment (at home, in schools & public whipping for some offences)
ReplyDelete& death penalty for murder. The majority of Jamaicans support these punishment but a minority is dictating to us.
That would certainly work
DeleteGood suggestions Vernon..but who is listening? Or would it make a difference if it came from someone else who they feel is a heavy weight?
ReplyDeleteThe measures mentioned in this article if executed efficiently would no doubt bear results. The issue is the mentality of the people. They have grown so accustomed to the wicked being glorified, overlooked and escaping punishment that they lose hope in justice and integrity; some have even decided to join the ranks of the lawless.
ReplyDeleteThe country has to decide what is important and the future they want for the generations to come. It's obvious crime fighting speeches are just mere rhetoric and nothing significant is expected to be birthed from them.
A few suggestions:
1. Death penalty or life sentence for the murder of women, children and the elderly
2. Immediate removal of public officials who are involved in shady activities. Reinstatement is dependent on the outcome of the investigations and of course a vote of confidence in the parliament and via public polls
3. Speedy court case processing (6 months- 1 year)
4. No bail for serious crimes or those who could jeopardize the case, e,g,-. posing a threat to witnesses.
5. Remove all music and any other material promoting criminal activities from the airways or in the general public.
6. Hefty fines should be levied on private or public passenger vehicles playing violent music
7. Public promotional campaign showing the dangers of crime and violence to the society
8. Stiff penalties for students who fight in schools- possible expulsion after being involved in three fights in any academic year.
9. Life sentences for drug related crimes.
10. ZOSO or whatever it is called is a band aid measure and cannot fix the crime problem. We do not need a state of emergency to have security officers inside volatile communities or policing hotspots. It puts us in a state of contact emergencies and appear we cannot manage the crime situation. Wait on an actual emergency to use it.
A country speaks through its laws. Let's talk.